Learn
The 1954 journey — a spoken lecture on the Act
A live tutor takes you through Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954: what it protects, how the notices work, how landlords oppose renewal, and what the new lease looks like. Ask questions out loud whenever you like — just say “excuse me”.
Press play and I will begin the lecture.
Say “excuse me” at any point and I will stop and take your question. General information on the 1954 Act, not legal advice.
Chapter 1. Why the Act exists
The 1954 bargain: security of tenure for business tenants, and a landlord's route out.
- Part II applies to tenancies where the tenant occupies premises for the purposes of a business.
- Security of tenure means automatic continuation, not a fixed extension.
- The landlord's exit is the statutory grounds of opposition, not the expiry date.
- Compensation replaces renewal on the no-fault grounds.
- Occupation is a question of fact, not of title (Graysim).
Provisions covered: s.23 — tenancies to which Part II applies · s.24 — continuation of tenancies · s.30 — grounds of opposition
How the procedure works — the authorities
- Graysim Holdings Ltd v P&O Property Holdings Ltd [1996] AC 329Occupation cannot generally be shared: sub-let the whole and the renewal rights pass to the sub-tenants.
- Bacchiocchi v Academic Agency Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 1313A short closure for a business reason does not break business occupation before expiry.
Find an authority
Search the 40 cases cited across the lecture by name, topic or legal concept.
40 authorities
Graysim Holdings Ltd v P&O Property Holdings Ltd [1996] AC 329
Occupation cannot generally be shared: sub-let the whole and the renewal rights pass to the sub-tenants.
OccupationNoticesGrounds of oppositionBacchiocchi v Academic Agency Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 1313
A short closure for a business reason does not break business occupation before expiry.
OccupationGrounds of oppositionTerms of the new leaseTFS Stores Ltd v Designer Retail Outlet Centres (Mansfield) Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 688
Contracting-out survives technical attacks if the warning notice precedes commitment and the declaration is properly made.
OccupationNoticesContracting outCourt & procedureNewham LBC v Thomas-Van Staden [2008] EWCA Civ 1414
A warning notice or declaration describing the wrong term invalidates the exclusion.
OccupationNoticesContracting outCourt & procedureBarclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Ltd v Erimus Housing Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 303
Long occupation during negotiations is more likely a protected periodic tenancy than a tenancy at will.
OccupationContracting outCourt & procedureCardiothoracic Institute v Shrewdcrest Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 368
A genuine intention to allow occupation only while terms are agreed creates an unprotected tenancy at will.
OccupationTerms of the new leaseContracting outCourt & procedureEsselte AB v Pearl Assurance plc [1997] 1 WLR 891
A tenant genuinely out of business occupation at the term date needs no s.27 notice — the tenancy ends.
OccupationNoticesRent & interim rentHumber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports [2012] EWCA Civ 596
Interim rent under s.24A can move dramatically where the passing rent no longer reflects the market.
NoticesRent & interim rentBarclays Bank plc v Bee [2001] EWCA Civ 1126
A s.25 notice must state unambiguously whether renewal is opposed, and on which grounds; a second notice cures nothing.
NoticesMannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749
A notice is read as a reasonable recipient would read it, so an obvious clerical slip need not be fatal.
NoticesMan Ltd v Back Inn Time Diner Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 1509
Service and the identity of the competent landlord are conditions of a valid notice, not formalities.
NoticesSainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Medley Assets Ltd [2024] EWHC 1195 (Ch)
The holding is assessed on the facts at trial, so notices and claims must describe the premises as they are.
NoticesCourt & procedurePolyviou v Seeley [1980] 1 WLR 55
A s.26 request fixes the timetable; the tenant cannot withdraw or re-date it.
NoticesCourt & procedureGill v Lees News Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 1178
Fault grounds (a)–(c) are judged in the round at the hearing; cured breaches rarely defeat renewal.
Grounds of oppositionRedevelopmentBetty's Cafés Ltd v Phillips Furnishing Stores Ltd [1959] AC 20
Intention under ground (f) is tested at the date of the hearing, not when the notice was served.
NoticesGrounds of oppositionRedevelopmentS Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd [2018] UKSC 62
Works designed solely to defeat the renewal are not a genuine intention; the undertaking exposes conditionality.
Grounds of oppositionRedevelopmentMVL Properties (2017) Ltd v The Leadmill Ltd [2025] EWHC 349 (Ch)
Ground (f) and (g) can succeed even against a famous going concern where the intention is proved.
Grounds of oppositionRedevelopmentThomas v Hammond-Lawrence [1986] 1 WLR 456
Section 31A only helps where the works can genuinely be done with the tenant in place.
Grounds of oppositionRedevelopmentRomulus Trading Co Ltd v Trustees of Henry Smith's Charity [1990] 2 EGLR 75
Ground (g) needs a settled, realistic plan backed by means and practical steps.
Grounds of oppositionRedevelopmentPatel v Keles [2009] EWCA Civ 1187
An intention to occupy only briefly before selling is not an intention to occupy for a business.
OccupationGrounds of oppositionRedevelopmentB&M Retail Ltd v HSBC Bank Pension Trust (UK) Ltd [2023] EWHC 702 (Ch)
A landlord may pursue redevelopment opposition through its own termination claim even after a friendly notice.
NoticesGrounds of oppositionRedevelopmentCourt & procedureOld Street Retail Trustee (Jersey) Ltd v GB Healthcare Ltd [2024] EWHC 2833 (Ch)
Once proceedings start, discontinuance, costs and the s.64 clock drive the practical outcome.
Court & procedureO'May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd [1983] 2 AC 726
The current lease is the baseline; whoever proposes a change must justify it and it must be fair.
NoticesRent & interim rentTerms of the new leasePoundland Ltd v Toplain Ltd [2021] (Brentford County Court)
New guarantor and rent-suspension burdens were refused as unjustified changes.
NoticesRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseWH Smith Retail Holdings Ltd v Commerz Real Investmentgesellschaft mbH [2021] (Central London County Court)
A rent-suspension clause was allowed but confined to forced closure — fairness sets the limit.
NoticesRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseDukeminster Ltd v West End Investments (Cowell Group) Ltd [2021] EWHC 3466 (Ch)
Section 34 rent must rest on properly evidenced comparables.
NoticesRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseW (No.3) GP (Nominee A) Ltd v JD Sports Fashion plc [2024]
Term length and modern terms are set on evidence of the parties' real plans.
NoticesRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseLondon Kendal Street No.3 Ltd v Daejan Investments Ltd [2019] (Central London County Court)
Lease terms and duration feed directly back into the rent determined.
NoticesRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseBacchiocchi v Academic Agency Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 1313
Leaving shortly before the term end for a business reason does not forfeit s.37 compensation.
CompensationRoyal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea v Mellcraft Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 1451
Check the rateable value and the extent of the holding before agreeing a compensation figure.
NoticesCompensationTFS Stores Ltd v Designer Retail Outlet Centres (Mansfield) Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 688
Why the Commission kept contracting-out: the current procedure works and is widely relied on.
RedevelopmentRent & interim rentCompensationContracting outS Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd [2018] UKSC 62
The case that put ground (f) reformulation on the reform agenda.
Grounds of oppositionCompensationContracting outPolyviou v Seeley [1980] 1 WLR 55
A s.26 request is irrevocable — model the full calendar before you serve it.
RedevelopmentRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseCourt & procedureS Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd [2018] UKSC 62
The question that defeats a scheme designed only to remove the tenant.
RedevelopmentRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseCourt & procedureO'May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd [1983] 2 AC 726
The burden of justifying any change to the existing terms sits with the proposer.
RedevelopmentRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseCourt & procedureMVL Properties (2017) Ltd v Leadmill Ltd [2025] EWHC 349 (Ch)
Goodwill built by the tenant does not stop a landlord occupying under ground (g).
OccupationGrounds of oppositionRedevelopmentRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseCourt & procedureTFS Stores Ltd v Designer Retail Outlet Centres (Mansfield) Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 688
A properly followed contracting-out procedure will be upheld.
NoticesGrounds of oppositionRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseCompensationContracting outBetty's Cafés Ltd v Phillips Furnishing Stores Ltd [1959] AC 20
Ground (f) intention is tested at the hearing, so a scheme can be firmed up after service.
NoticesGrounds of oppositionRedevelopmentRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseCompensationContracting outGill v Lees News Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 1575
The fault grounds turn on conduct in the round and the position at the hearing date.
NoticesGrounds of oppositionRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseCompensationContracting outPatel v Keles [2009] EWCA Civ 1187
A plan to occupy briefly and sell on is not a genuine ground (g) intention.
OccupationNoticesGrounds of oppositionRent & interim rentTerms of the new leaseCompensationContracting out
12 chapters, in order
The tutor reads the lecture aloud, chapter by chapter — about 55 minutes end to end. Jump to any chapter from the syllabus, and finish with a ten-question quiz that is different every time.
Say “excuse me”
Interrupt at any point. The tutor stops mid-sentence, listens to your question, answers it out loud, then picks the lecture back up.
Cited as it goes
Each chapter lists the provisions it relies on, so you can read the section text afterwards and check the ground for yourself.
After the lecture
Put it to work on real facts: test a notice, work out your dates, or read the section text in full.
Working on a real matter?
Ask a commercial property surveyor about a live case
Students and practitioners are welcome. Leave your details and a surveyor will come back to you about the matter or the topic you are studying.
How soon do you need help?
Best way to reach you
Your details and anything you add are shared with mcgarrigle & co so they can advise you. Nothing here creates a surveyor–client relationship until agreed in writing.
Sponsored by McGarrigle & Co